No one would be more excited than me to learn of the discovery of extraterrestrial life, be it intelligent life via SETI or the simplest of microbes on Mars or somewhere else nearby (Europa, or tiny Enceladus, for a real stretch). And it is wise to be aware that we may not recognized ET life because we will be looking for the familiar and ET life might be organized quite differently than terrestrial life. This appears to be the point of a paper delivered at the meeting of the American Astronomical Society by Dirk Schulze-Makuch about the possibility of Martian microbes going unrecognized by the Viking landers’ life-searching experiments. The media coverage, however, paints the paper thus:
Two NASA space probes that visited Mars 30 years ago may have stumbled upon alien microbes on the Red Planet and inadvertently killed them, a scientist theorizes in a paper released Sunday.
Okay, that’s just one article, but the other one I saw on-line had a similar wording. This is the lead sentence in the article, and it is worded to suggest that the Viking landers actually did find alien microbes and kill them. Of course, all we can know, and I’m willing to bet this is what Schulze-Makuch says in his paper, is that if there were alien microbes of a certain type (in this case, with lots of Hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) rather than H2O) on Mars, then the Viking experiments would not have identified them but would instead of killed them. That’s a subtle change of wording resulting a gigantic change of meaning. Reading the Yahoo! article one gets the impression that it is suggested there is life on Mars, while the reality is simply that the Viking experiments of the 70′s were not able to detect a variety of theoretically possible alien biochemistries.
There is no solid evidence for life on Mars. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence, and when it comes to life on Mars, we’re still looking for it. I hope we find it, but I’m not holding my breath.