Archive for February, 2009

Gran Torino

Friday, February 27th, 2009

Clint Eastwood growls his way through this movie of an angry old man finding new friends in the least likely of places. Namely in the new Hmong neighbors living next door. Walt (Eastwood) is retired from the Ford plant where he worked his whole life, and the movie opens with the funeral for his wife. His two sons, bratty grandkids in tow, have no connection with him. They regard him with something bordering on zoological curiosity, mixed with a hint of guilt and obligation. They want him to behave like a nice old man and move into a peaceful retirement community instead of stubbornly sticking to his decaying neighborhood.

The young priest who performed his wife’s funeral service promised his wife that he would look after Walt. This is annoying to Walt, and at times is annoying to the audience. When the young Hmong brother and sister next door get hassled by a local gang of thugs (ostensibly to bring the boy, Thao, into the gang), Walt gets involved because they step on his lawn. He demonstrates his displeasure with a shotgun. Standing up to the gang makes him a hero in the eyes of his neighbors whose persistence in being neighborly eventually wears down Walt’s defenses. He learns how to be a father, though it’s not clear why it didn’t work with his own kids. We must assume that they were innately callow. While the movie is not ground-breaking, it is touching, and it is genuinely fun to see Eastwood growling and kicking his way through the mess that encroaches on him.

What is Wrong with Congress?

Tuesday, February 10th, 2009

It is widely known that the problem with the economy now is that there is reduced changeover of money. People are saving what little they have because of economic insecurity, and this results in less money flowing through the economy. A reduced flux of money through the system, to borrow a physics term, means fewer purchases and therefore fewer jobs for retailers and manufacturers. The stimulus bill is supposed to spur people to start spending again. The most obvious way to do that is to actually hire people. Repairing a road or a railroad line or building a smart electrical grid requires hiring construction workers and engineers. The same holds true for rebuilding schools and making government buildings more energy efficient. And these are things that are meritorious in their own right. Even re-sodding the National Mall means you’ve got to go buy sod from some farm somewhere and hire people to do the work to lay it. Those people then can afford to buy clothes, gas, food, and maybe even see a movie or get a new TV, helping keep the people in those industries employed. In fact, the one way the government can spend money that won’t stimulate the economy is giving tax breaks to people who are relatively well-off. We are the ones who can afford to put that extra money in a bank account (or maybe under a mattress these days).

So what the frak is the problem with these so-called centrists? Why is there so much tax cutting by self-proclaimed fiscal conservatives that will produce the smallest injection of money into the economy, and so much cutting of direct spending measures that will actually result in people working? Are they idiots? Or are they mean? I’m actually asking.