<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sherlock Holmes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://joshuacolwell.com/blog/index.php/2010/sherlock-holmes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://joshuacolwell.com/blog/index.php/2010/sherlock-holmes/</link>
	<description>Science, astronomy, politics, movies, and various minutiae.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2012 23:50:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh Colwell</title>
		<link>http://joshuacolwell.com/blog/index.php/2010/sherlock-holmes/comment-page-1/#comment-170601</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh Colwell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 21:28:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joshuacolwell.com/blog/?p=515#comment-170601</guid>
		<description>I was very anxious with the satanic start to the movie, and soooo relieved when Holmes cracked the case.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was very anxious with the satanic start to the movie, and soooo relieved when Holmes cracked the case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://joshuacolwell.com/blog/index.php/2010/sherlock-holmes/comment-page-1/#comment-170598</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 21:18:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joshuacolwell.com/blog/?p=515#comment-170598</guid>
		<description>Why does it seem to be a requirement that modern Holmes adaptations involve Satanism (cf. 1985&#039;s &quot;Young Sherlock Holmes&quot;)?  I find that annoying.  On the other hand, an &quot;adventurous and macho&quot; Watson is absolutely in keeping with Conan Doyle&#039;s original stories, contra the classic Hollywood portrayal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why does it seem to be a requirement that modern Holmes adaptations involve Satanism (cf. 1985&#8242;s &#8220;Young Sherlock Holmes&#8221;)?  I find that annoying.  On the other hand, an &#8220;adventurous and macho&#8221; Watson is absolutely in keeping with Conan Doyle&#8217;s original stories, contra the classic Hollywood portrayal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

